I thought the point of putting the Time Stone back was to prevent all that. [ Which is how she ended up here because she didn't, or at least she didn't manage to do so without touching anything, oops. ] You're saying there are other ways to change the course of time?
Time Stone doesn't factor into any of this really. Have you heard of the butterfly effect? That's the easiest way to change a timeline. I can also just say any decision a creature makes can create a branch. We don't prune those anymore so they're free to do their own thing.
What do we do, then, if those altered timelines are free to do their own thing now? [ Or, well, just her now since he's retiring? It's a small reprieve, at least, that what she's changed gets to stay changed. She'll happily spend as long as it takes paying for what she's done. ]
Yeah. Title's The Butterfly Effect. The protagonist has blackouts and later finds out that it's because his future self, which is his present at that point, can travel back in time and inhabit his younger body.
Huh. That's not so bad. [ Boring, but it could be worse? ]
Who decides if something is considered a threat to the timeline though, as opposed to a natural progression?
That's the basic idea yea. Causes branches in timelines all the time. I'll have to make a note of it. There are way too many movies I still need to catch up on.
We're still figuring it out. I keep hearing something about "anchor beings" but I'm not entirely sure.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
Have you heard of the butterfly effect? That's the easiest way to change a timeline.
I can also just say any decision a creature makes can create a branch. We don't prune those anymore so they're free to do their own thing.
no subject
What do we do, then, if those altered timelines are free to do their own thing now? [ Or, well, just her now since he's retiring? It's a small reprieve, at least, that what she's changed gets to stay changed. She'll happily spend as long as it takes paying for what she's done. ]
no subject
We just watch them. Maintain them. Make sure nothing interrupts the natural progression of things.
no subject
Huh. That's not so bad. [ Boring, but it could be worse? ]
Who decides if something is considered a threat to the timeline though, as opposed to a natural progression?
no subject
I'll have to make a note of it. There are way too many movies I still need to catch up on.
We're still figuring it out. I keep hearing something about "anchor beings" but I'm not entirely sure.